No, it’s not a logo, it’s today’s Astronomy Picture of the Day. It really looks like a logo though don’t you think? It reminds me of all the swooshes and planetary logos we’ve seen over the years, except this time it’s the real thing. That’s what it looks like.
Recycling in Taiwan
I came across this today, Taiwan’s recycling logo. Note the effective use of white space - a reminder of the excellent FedEx logo.
Coventry University Logo
Yes, it’s been around a while, but I don’t trawl for university logos very often. I came across the Coventry University logo today, and was immediately drawn to the calligraphic strokes forming the phoenix image - they remind me of the intaglio-printed lines on banknotes. I have quite a thing for banknote designs anyway. Interestingly, it seems the University decided that right-facing is future-looking, although the idea of using the phoenix refers quite specifically to the past (not that I disagree with their decision). The Wikipedia entry on the logo has this:
In the summer of 2006 the symbol was flipped on its vertical axis in order to portray the head of the phoenix looking to the right. The reason behind the decision was the desire to portray the university as looking forward rather than back.
MimeArtist: Great Logo
Found via Computerlove, the portfolio site of James Stone, mimeArtist. It’s a nice site, but the thing that got my attention was the great logo, it’s beautifully expressive and simple. Wish I’d thought of it.
Trademark This!
Photoshop has a new logo. No, sorry, I mean Photoshop® has a new® logo™. I saw it on the Adobe page this morning and thought it was a bit of a poor spoof, “This is surely the work of an amateur, as Adobe would never make such a cheap-looking logo.” Unfortunately I was wrong. I saw this article on 30gms, and followed the link to where John Nack, head of product development at Adobe has written about it on his blog, and it’s clear from the comments that most people’s reactions were similar to mine.
The question is, does Photoshop need a logo? If so, does it need anything more than a logotype? A brand-mark like that seems overkill to me, and the addition of the fly-speck TMs and Rs buzzing about it and the putrid dribble of tagline underneath only completes the analogy… of something killed, and left to rot under a bush somewhere.
The Ladies’ Tea
I just came across “The Ladies Tea” on Swissmiss just now. Like her, I smiled at the logo, which is rather lovely, but couldn’t help but notice the awful kerning on the type. Below I’ve got the original on the left, and a version where I simply retyped the name in Arno Pro on the right. My modified version isn’t perfect, but at least the D-I-E combo isn’t quite so munged.
Yes, I know there’s a missing apostrophe, but putting it in doesn’t help the logo one bit.